1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 789 F.2d
  5. 789 F.2d 1556 (1986)
 

POLAROID CORP. v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.

Appeal No. 86-604.

789 F.2d 1556 (1986)

POLAROID CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 25, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis T. Carr, Kenyon & Kenyon, New York City, argued, for defendant-appellant. With him on brief, were Kenneth E. Madsen, James Galbraith and Walter E. Hanley, Jr.

Herbert F. Schwartz, Fish & Neave, New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellee. With him on brief, were Kenneth B. Herman, Edward F. Mullowney, Patricia A. Martone, Richard M. Barnes, Robert J. Goldman, and Kevin J. Culligan.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, SMITH and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Zobel, J.), holding claims of seven patents issued to Polaroid Corporation (Polaroid) valid and infringed. 228 USPQ 305, 344 (D.Mass.1985). We affirm the appealed portions of the judgment in all respects.

I. Background

Polaroid sued Kodak on April 26, 1976 for infringement, 35 U.S.C. § 271(a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases