1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 792 F.2d
  5. 792 F.2d 1482 (1986)
 

WILLIAMS v. EDWARD APFFELS COFFEE CO.

No. 85-6204.

792 F.2d 1482 (1986)

Arnold B. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDWARD APFFELS COFFEE COMPANY, Bill Berry and J.C. Hill, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 1, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold B. Williams, Los Angeles, Cal., in pro per.

Barry Bartholomew, Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, Universal City, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before WRIGHT and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ, District Judge.

NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Arnold B. Williams appeals pro se from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Edward Apffels Coffee Company. He contends that the district court erred in finding that: (1) no genuine issue of material fact remained as to whether Apffels had discriminated against Williams on the basis of race and age; (2) Williams had not alleged sufficient facts to state a cause of action under the California Fair Employment and Housing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases