1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 785 F.2d
  5. 785 F.2d 1410 (1986)
 

KUNTZ v. REESE

No. 83-2151.

785 F.2d 1410 (1986)

Richard P. KUNTZ, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Nat J. REESE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 31, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Bradford Huss, Hall, Henry, Oliver & McReavy, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Donn Dimichele, Brian C. Cuff, Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, Los Angeles, Cal., Richard B. Glickman, Rosenman, Colin, Freund, Lewis & Cohen, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before TANG and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges, and REAL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Shortly after we decided this case on May 13, 1985, see Kuntz v. Reese, 760 F.2d 926 (9th Cir.1985), the Reese defendants1 petitioned our court to rehear this matter. The Reese defendants argue, among other things, that several persuasive authorities outside this circuit undermine the contention that the Kuntz plaintiffs2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases