1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 492 So.2d
  5. 492 So.2d 1279 (1986)
 

KARL v. AMOCO PRODUCTION CO.

No. 86-496.

492 So.2d 1279 (1986)

William Arthur KARL, et al, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

August 19, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones, Jones & Alexander, J.B. Jones, Jr., Cameron, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

Woodley, Banrett, E.E. Woodley, Scofield & Associates, David L. Hoskins, Lake Charles, La., Michael T. Pulaski, New Orleans, La., Keith Prudhomme, Lake Charles, La., for defendant-appellee.

Before STOKER, KNOLL and KING, JJ.

MOTION TO DISMISS

KING, Judge.

The defendant-appellee, Ford Motor Company, moves to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff-appellant, William Arthur Karl, on the grounds that the plaintiff having accepted a remittitur of the damages awarded him in the trial court has no right to appeal the reformed judgment.

The trial court signed a final judgment on November 12, 1985, finding the mover, Ford Motor Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases