EALING CORP. v. HARRODS LTD.

No. 85-1813.

790 F.2d 978 (1986)

The EALING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. HARRODS LIMITED, Defendant, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided May 16, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William P. Stimson with whom Katherine J. Ross and Sullivan & Worcester, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for plaintiff, appellant.

Joseph L. Cotter with whom John C. Englander and Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for defendant, appellee.

Before COFFIN and BOWNES, Circuit Judges, and PETTINE, Senior District Judge.


BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Ealing Corporation (Ealing) appeals the dismissal of its combination contract/tort claim against defendant-appellee Harrods, Ltd. (Harrods) for "lack of jurisdiction over the person." Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). Ealing alleged that Harrods breached express and implied agreements governing a marketing venture between the two companies whereby a "pilot scheme" was set up for the catalog sale of Harrods' merchandise in the United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases