GEORGE HYMAN CONST. CO., INC. v. DiNICOLA

Nos. 82-511, 82-564 and 82-565.

514 A.2d 1180 (1986)

GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. G. Russell DiNICOLA, et al., Appellees. & BOATMAN & MAGNANI, INC., Appellant, v. G. Russell DiNICOLA, et al., Appellees. G. Russell DiNICOLA, et al., Appellants, v. GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided September 12, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne M. Mansulla, Washington, D.C., for appellant DiNicola.

William J. Donnelly, Jr., Washington, D.C., for appellant George Hyman Const. Co., Inc.

No appearance was entered for appellant Boatman & Magnani, Inc.

Before NEWMAN, FERREN and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.


FERREN, Associate Judge:

Appellant, Russell DiNicola, contends the trial court erroneously denied his motion for prejudgment interest in this tort action. Appellee, George Hyman Construction Company, Inc., replies that in the District of Columbia prejudgment interest is not available in tort actions. Hyman adds that, because appellant has accepted payment of the judgment, he is precluded in any event from challenging on appeal the denial of prejudgment interest. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases