STATE v. HA

M65930; CA A38775.

728 P.2d 932 (1986)

82 Or.App. 570

STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Binh Thi Thanh HA, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 4, 1986.

Reconsideration Denied January 30, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for appellant. With him on brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Laura Graser, Portland, argued the cause and filed brief, for respondent.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and RICHARDSON and ROSSMAN, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Judge.

The state appeals from the trial court's dismissal of a complaint charging defendant with theft in the second degree. ORS 164.045. The charge resulted from defendant's alleged shoplifting at a department store. After defendant was charged, the store management demanded and received payment from her pursuant to ORS 30.875. She moved to dismiss the charge on the ground that her payment to the store "represents a civil compromise" under ORS 135.703...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases