1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 725 P.2d
  5. 725 P.2d 925 (1986)
 

BROOKE v. MT. HOOD MEADOWS OREG., LTD.

A8309-05568; CA A34946.

725 P.2d 925 (1986)

81 Or. App. 387

Elizabeth M. BROOKE, Helen M. Thompson, and S. Eberly Thompson, Jr., Respondents, v. MT. HOOD MEADOWS OREG., LTD., an Oregon limited partnership, and Mt. Hood Meadows Development Corp., an Oregon corporation, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 24, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen T. Janik, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Wayne Hilliard, Jeffrey M. Batchelor and Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson & Young, Portland.

John R. Brooke, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Peter G. Voorhies and Wood Tatum Mosser Brooke & Holden, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs are three of 18 limited partners in Mt. Hood Meadows, Oreg., Ltd., a limited partnership established to carry on the business of constructing and operating a winter sports development in the Hood River Meadows area of the Mt. Hood National Forest. They brought this action against the general partner, Mt. Hood Meadows Development Corp., and the partnership for money had and received and conversion. The conversion claim was dismissed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases