BERNARD v. VATHEUER

A8310-06396; CA A36722.

728 P.2d 916 (1986)

82 Or.App. 524

Norman BERNARD, Respondent, v. Hans VATHEUER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 19, 1986.

Reconsideration Denied January 16, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mildred J. Carmack, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs were Paul R. Bocci and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.

Michael S. Sommers, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Frank E. Day and Burt & Day, P.C., Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals a judgment for plaintiff on a jury verdict in his action for breach of an oral joint venture agreement. Defendant's principal assignment of error is that the court denied his motion for a directed verdict. We affirm.

Defendant's primary argument is that plaintiff's evidence of a joint venture agreement was inadequate as a matter of law, because it was not "clear and convincing."1 Defendant relies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases