1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 728 P.2d
  5. 728 P.2d 894 (1986)
 

STATE v. KIMMEL

C84-08-33493; CA A34546.

728 P.2d 894 (1986)

82 Or.App. 486

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Robert Lee KIMMEL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 19, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin W. Reeves, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

John A. Reuling, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARDEN, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and YOUNG, J.

YOUNG, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving while suspended. Former ORS 487.560 (now ORS 811.175). He assigns as error the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the stop of his vehicle. The ground for the motion was that there were insufficient facts to justify the stop. We reverse.

Officer Luher testified for the state at the suppression hearing. At about 6 p.m. on August 12, 1984, he was driving north on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases