U.S. v. EIGHTY-NINE (89) BOTTLES OF EAU DE JOY

No. 85-2007.

797 F.2d 767 (1986)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EIGHTY-NINE (89) BOTTLES OF "EAU DE JOY," "100," "Eau de Patou," "Joy," "Caline," and "Eau de Caline" Perfumes, Defendants, and Jacqueline de Nola, Intervenor-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 18, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lynn K. Richardson, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Joseph L. Strabala, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants and intervenor-appellee.

Before NELSON, CANBY and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.


CANBY, Circuit Judge:

This is a civil in rem action in which the United States sought forfeiture of some perfumes it contends were imported in violation of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1526(a) (1982). Upon a motion from intervenor de Nola, the district court granted summary judgment for defendant perfumes; it denied the government's summary judgment motion. The government appeals, and we now reverse.

BACKGROUND

Intervenor Jacqueline...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases