THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES v. WOLD ENGINEERING, P. C.

No. 84-1973.

476 U.S. 877 (1986)

THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES OF THE FORT BERTHOLD RESERVATION v. WOLD ENGINEERING, P. C., ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 16, 1986


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond Cross argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were John O. Holm and Christopher D. Quale.

Gary H. Lee argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.*

Nicholas J. Spaeth, Attorney General, and Terry L. Adkins, Assistant Attorney General, filed a brief for the State of North Dakota as amicus curiae urging affirmance.


JUSTICE O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court.

Petitioner, Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, sought to sue respondent, Wold Engineering, P. C. (hereafter respondent), in state court for negligence and breach of contract. The North Dakota Supreme Court held that Chapter 27-19 of the North Dakota Century Code (1974) disclaimed the unconditional state court civil jurisdiction North Dakota had previously extended to tribal Indians suing non...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases