1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 790 F.2d
  5. 790 F.2d 524 (1986)
 

KING v. SOUTH CENT. BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH

No. 84-5186.

790 F.2d 524 (1986)

Clara R. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY and Communication Workers, AFL-CIO, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided May 14, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward G. Phillips (argued), John B. Rayson, Kramer, Johnson, Rayson, McVeigh & Leake, Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellant.

Rebecca M. Lough, Atty., Michael J. Passino, Barrett & Ray, P.C., Nashville, Tenn., Thomas W. Moore (argued), John C. Carey, Gen. Sol., Birmingham, Ala., Donald R. Livingston (argued), Adair & Goldthwaite, P.C., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Before MERRITT and CONTIE, Circuit Judges, and DeMASCIO, District Judge.

DeMASCIO, District Judge.

On October 28, 1983, Clara R. King (King) filed this sex discrimination action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee against South Central Bell Telephone Company (Bell) and her union, the Communication Workers of America, AFL-CIO (CWA). King alleged that Bell violated Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., by reinstating her to a lower paying job when she returned to work after a maternity leave...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases