SCHLEMMER v. FARMERS UNION CENT. EXCHANGE

No. C0-86-612.

397 N.W.2d 903 (1986)

Robert L. SCHLEMMER, et al., Appellants, v. FARMERS UNION CENTRAL EXCHANGE, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 16, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth P. Griswold, Ruttenberg, Griswold, Orren & Associates, St. Paul, for appellants.

John J. McGirl, Jr., Doherty, Rumble & Butler, Professional Ass'n, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and LANSING and LESLIE, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Former employees of respondent Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. (CENEX) claim they were unlawfully discharged on the basis of age. The employees appeal the trial court's determination that they failed to establish this claim. Appellants allege inadequate findings and insufficient evidence to support the findings, conclusions, and judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

CENEX

Respondent CENEX is a regional farm supply...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases