IN RE QUEENER

Appeal No. 85-2084.

796 F.2d 461 (1986)

In re C.A. QUEENER.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 21, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Rohrer, Intern. Business Machines Corp., Boulder, Colo., argued, for appellant. With him on brief was Elliott Pollack, Pollack, Vande Sande and Priddy, Washington, D.C.

John W. Dewhirst, Associate Solicitor, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Arlington, Va., argued, for appellee. With him on brief were Joseph F. Nakamura, Solicitor and Fred E. McKelvey, Deputy Solicitor.

Before DAVIS, Circuit Judge, MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, and NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.


PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") Board of Appeals ("board") sustaining the examiner's rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 6, and 10 of appellant's reexamination application1 for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The claims in issue are derived from patent 3,647,293 ("'293") originally filed December 1, 1970, issued March 7, 1972, to Queener...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases