STATE v. RODRIGUEZ

No. 85-373.

483 So.2d 751 (1986)

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Eugenio RODRIGUEZ, Carlos I. Estrada, Rolando Fernandez, Aurelio Cicard, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied March 3, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Henry H. Harnage, Asst. Public Defender, Nathan and Williams and Douglas Williams, Moore & Rabin, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order dismissing the information against the defendants. We reverse. The state does not have an obligation to produce witnesses for deposition. State v. Valdes, 443 So.2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); State v. Roig, 305 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Once the state revealed the name and address of the informant, it fulfilled its obligation. Consequently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases