ELLIOTT v. CHICAGO MOTOR CLUB INS.

No. 86-1890.

809 F.2d 347 (1986)

Charles ELLIOTT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHICAGO MOTOR CLUB INSURANCE (A Reciprocal), et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided December 16, 1986.

Opinion January 14, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hope E. Keefe, Brunswick & Keefe, Blue Island, Ill., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Barry L. Kroll, Williams & Montgomery, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellees.

Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.


BAUER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs, members of the Elliott family, appeal the dismissal of their cause of action with prejudice because their amended complaint failed to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The complaint, a civil RICO action, alleged the defendants, an insurance company and its related entities along with its lawyer, breached fiduciary duties, and their conduct constituted a scheme to defraud the Elliotts by use of mail...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases