VOORHIES v. WOOD, TATUM, MOSSER

82-04559; CA A35591.

725 P.2d 405 (1986)

81 Or. App. 336

In the Matter of the Compensation of Peter G. Voorhies, Claimant. Peter G. VOORHIES, Petitioner, v. WOOD, TATUM, MOSSER, BROOKE & HOLDEN, and St. Paul Insurance, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 10, 1986.

Reconsideration Denied November 7, 1986.

Review Denied December 3, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland.

Deborah L. Sather, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on brief was Moscato & Byerly, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Claimant seeks reversal of a Workers' Compensation Board order which affirmed the referee's dismissal of claimant's request for a hearing on the ground that it was untimely filed. His only assignment of error that merits discussion is that the referee erred in not excusing his late filing on the basis of "good cause."1

Claimant, a partner in respondent law firm, was seriously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases