RUTLEDGE v. RUTLEDGE

No. 2-85-178-CV.

709 S.W.2d 389 (1986)

Rome RUTLEDGE, Appellant, v. Ruth RUTLEDGE, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

May 15, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Crampton, Crampton & Estrada, Holly Crampton, Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Fillmore, Purtle, Spurgers & Briley, Stephen Briley, Wichita Falls, for appellee.

Before BURDOCK, HILL and HUGHES (Retired, Sitting by Assignment), JJ.


OPINION

HILL, Justice.

Rome Rutledge appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage to Ruth Rutledge and dividing their community estate. In four points of error, Rome asserts that the trial court erred in not granting him a motion for new trial because of fraudulent misrepresentation made by Ruth at trial, and that the trial court abused its discretion in the division of the community estate by making an unequal division favorable to Ruth.

We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases