STATE v. FARLEY

TC 84-1870-C; CA A35584; SC S32706.

725 P.2d 359 (1986)

301 Or. 668

STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Donald FARLEY, Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 16, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest E. Estes, Deputy Public Defender for Oregon, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender for Oregon, Salem.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response to the petition were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.


LINDE, Justice.

In this case and in State v. Ellison, 301 Or. 676, 725 P.2d 363, also decided today, the Court of Appeals rejected claims by defendants charged with driving when their licenses were suspended1 that they were "put in jeopardy twice for the same offence," contrary to Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. We hold that the claim should have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases