UNITED STATES v. HOGAN

No. 84-1687.

779 F.2d 296 (1986)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barry Kendall HOGAN, and Mark Bradford Hogan, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Opinion on Denial of Rehearing February 3, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald P. Guyer, Gerald H. Goldstein, John A. Convery, San Antonio, Tex., for Barry Kendall Hogan.

Robert G. Turner, Houston, Tex., for Mark Bradford Hogan.

Edward C. Prado, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Mervyn Hamburg, Atty., Appellate Sec., Crim.Div., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, and POLITZ, Circuit Judges.


(Opinion August 29, 1985, 5th Cir., 771 F.2d 82)

PER CURIAM:

Based upon the record as supplemented after limited remand, we affirm the findings of the district court that the notes of DEA Agent Braziel were not covered by the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500(e)(2).

Pursuant to this court's opinions of June 7 and August 29, 1985, the convictions of Barry Kendall Hogan and Mark Bradford Hogan on Count 2 are affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases