ALEXANDER & ALEXANDER OF NEW YORK, INC. v. FRITZEN


68 N.Y.2d 968 (1986)

Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc., Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. Harry W. Fritzen, Jr., et al., Defendants, and James W. Barber, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 20, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. Brown for appellant.

Spiros A. Tsimbinos and Joseph Filardi for respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

This appeal, as limited by plaintiff's brief, relates only to the first cause of action against defendant Barber for conspiracy to divert business opportunities, and to the fifth cause of action against Barber for interference with plaintiff's claimed contract relationship with defendants Fritzen and Bikoff. It arises out of defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases