Supreme Court of North Carolina.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 7, 1985.
May 7, 1985.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Thomas E. Strickland, Goldsboro, for plaintiff-appellant.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., Sr. Deputy Atty. Gen., and Edwin M. Speas, Jr., Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State appellee.
John W. Whitehead, Manassas, Va., Holleman & Stam by Paul B. Stam, Jr., Apex, for The Rutherford Institute.
Ware, Parker, Johnson, Cook & Dunlevie by Wendell R. Bird, Richard W. Summers, Atlanta, Ga., for The Rutherford Institute of Georgia Legal Defense Foundation, amici curiae.
Frank J. Sizemore, III, Greensboro, and Richard B. Harper, Durham, for The Christian Legal Society, amicus curiae.
Tharrington, Smith & Hargrove by George T. Rogister, Jr., and Ann L. Majestic, Raleigh, for The North Carolina School Boards Ass'n, amicus curiae.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
EXUM, Justice.
Plaintiff educates his children at home. The dispositive question for decision is whether plaintiff's home instruction is prohibited by our compulsory school attendance statutes.1 We conclude that it is not. We do not, therefore, reach the question whether these statutes would violate plaintiff's constitutional freedoms if they prohibited him from so educating his children.
I.
Delconte instituted this action...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
