1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 696 P.2d
  5. 696 P.2d 264 (1985)
 

SCHNIER v. DIST. CT., CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER

No. 84SA123.

696 P.2d 264 (1985)

R. Ronald SCHNIER, Petitioner, v. The DISTRICT COURT In and For the CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, State of Colorado and the Honorable Sandra I. Rothenberg, one of the Judges thereof, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

February 4, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gengler & Gengler, Ted J. Gengler, Denver, for petitioner.

Cogswell & Wehrle, Thomas J. Kimmell, Eugene S. Burk, Denver, for respondents.

ROVIRA, Justice.

We issued a rule pursuant to C.A.R. 21 to show cause why the respondent district court should not be prohibited from entering a judgment for $153,000 plus interest in a contempt proceeding held a year after final judgment had been entered in a case decreeing specific performance. We now discharge the rule.

I.

Lexicon Resources Corporation (Lexicon) sued R. Ronald Schnier (petitioner) in the

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases