OTT, Acting Chief Judge.
A jury convicted appellant of three counts of uttering a forged check. On appeal, he raises three points. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
First, appellant argues that the trial court erred in refusing his requested instruction on his defense of authorization. A defendant is entitled to have the jury properly instructed on any valid defense supported by the evidence. Palmes v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.