CLAIMANT MEMBERS OF BOILERMAKERS v. EMP. DIV.

84-AB-353, 84-AB-589, CA 31521 (Control), A31531, A31563 (Cases Consolidated).

699 P.2d 203 (1985)

73 Or.App. 470

CLAIMANT MEMBERS OF BOILERMAKERS Local 72, Carpenters Local 247, Electricians Local 48, Laborers Local 296, Machinists Local 63, Painters Local 10, Sheetmetal Workers Local 16, and Steamfitters Local 235, Petitioners, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent, and Dillingham Ship Repair Company and Northwest Marine Iron Works, Respondents. Lynn M. Mattix and Kay A. Bullock, Petitioners, v. Employment Division, Dillingham Ship Repair Company and Northwest Marine Iron Works, Respondents. Charles S. Liesegang, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION AND NORTHWEST MARINE IRON WORKS, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 1, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied July 5, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Coon, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Samuel J. Imperati, and Welch, Bruun and Green, Portland.

Linda DeVries, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Employment Division. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer and James E. Mountain, Jr., Salem.

David H. Wilson, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondent Dillingham Ship Repair Co. With him on the brief were Amy Segel, and Bullard, Korshoj, Smith and Jernstedt, Portland.

Wayne D. Landsverk, Portland, waived appearance for respondent Northwest Marine Iron Works.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Petitioners are approximately 750 members of several metal crafts unions who were employed at Dillingham Ship Repair Company and Northwest Marine Iron Works. Those unions struck the companies, as part of a strike against all west coast shipyards, from July 26, 1983, through September 26, 1983. At the time the strike began, petitioners were on layoff status with the company; some had been laid off for several weeks, and some were laid off the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases