UNITED STATES v. RANDELL

Docket 85-1150.

761 F.2d 122 (1985)

UNITED STATES of America, Respondent, v. Jack RANDELL, Petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided May 3, 1985.

As Amended June 4, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark M. Baker, New York City (Slotnick & Cutler, P.C., Barry Ivan Slotnick, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.

John Mulcahy, New York City, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y. (Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Before FEINBERG, Chief Judge, FRIENDLY and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges.


FEINBERG, Chief Judge:

This application for bail pending appeal calls upon us to interpret that portion of the Bail Reform Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-473, tit. II, 98 Stat.1976, that conditions such release upon a finding that the appeal "raises a substantial question of law or fact likely to result in reversal or an order for a new trial." Id. at § 203, 98 Stat.1982 (to be codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3143). Because the proper interpretation of this section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases