Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: "The dismissal of the cause of action based upon fraud is without prejudice to an application by plaintiffs to Supreme Court for leave to serve an amended complaint with regard to that cause of action. Such application should include a copy of the proposed amended complaint accompanied by a disclosure of the evidentiary facts which would support the claims set forth in the proposed amended complaint and would justify the granting of such leave (see, CPLR 3016 [b]; cf. CPLR 3211 [d], [e])." [See, 65 N.Y.2d 536.]
CREDIT ALLIANCE CORP. v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.
66 N.Y.2d 812 (1985)
Credit Alliance Corporation et al., Respondents, v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted August 12, 1985.
Decided November 12, 1985.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.