CARL v. PENNINGTON

No. C4-84-1404.

364 N.W.2d 455 (1985)

Patricia K. CARL, et al., Appellants, v. Corbin PENNINGTON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 19, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oakes & Kanatz, St. Paul, for appellants.

Ronald J. Johnson, Hopkins, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc, consisting of POPOVICH, C.J., and FOLEY, WOZNIAK, LANSING, LESLIE, NIERENGARTEN and CRIPPEN, JJ.


OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of respondent Corbin Pennington on appellant Patricia Carl's claim for noneconomic loss benefits under no-fault automobile insurance. The trial court found that Carl had not met the permanent injury threshold for her claim. We reverse.

FACTS

On January 16, 1976, Carl was involved in a rearend automobile accident on her way to work. She heard and felt a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases