1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 302 Md.
  5. 302 Md. 501 (1985)
 

DONOCAM ASSOC. v. WASH. SUB. SAN. COMM'N

No. 77, September Term, 1984.

302 Md. 501 (1985)

489 A.2d 26

DONOCAM ASSOCIATES ET AL. v. WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Motion for Reconsideration Denied April 19, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan M. Reutershan, Silver Spring (Joseph P. Blocher and Linowes & Blocher, Silver Spring, on brief), for appellants.

Harry L. Durity, Hyattsville, for appellee.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, RODOWSKY and COUCH, JJ., and W. ALBERT MENCHINE, Associate Judge of the Court of Special Appeals (retired) Specially Assigned.

SMITH, Judge.

We shall here hold that a hearing held by the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission was a "contested case" within the meaning of Maryland Code (1957, 1978 Repl.Vol., 1981 Cum.Supp.) Art. 41, § 244(d).1 We also shall hold that the Commission improperly levied front-foot benefit charges on the land of appellants, Donocam Associates et al.

I

Just what has happened here will be better understood by reference...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases