1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 712 P.2d
  5. 712 P.2d 79 (1985)
 

STATE v. DYKAST

CC 8301-0185, 8301-0186, 8301-0187, CA A30963, A30964, A30965 and SC S31757.

712 P.2d 79 (1985)

300 Or. 368

STATE of Oregon, Respondent On Review, v. David E. DYKAST, Petitioner On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided December 17, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Brown, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition for review were Harold S. Harding, and Enfield, Guimond & Brown, Salem.

Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response to the petition for review were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

PETERSON, Chief Justice.

The question is whether the defendant's rights to a speedy trial were violated where 560 days elapsed between his original arrest and the trial. We hold that the defendant's rights were not violated and affirm his conviction. 73 Or.App. 98, 697 P.2d 578.

The chronology of events is:

March 30, 1982 The defendant was indicted on two charges of delivery of a controlled substance. ORS...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases