CUDD v. CROWNHART

No. 84-362.

122 Wis.2d 656 (1985)

364 N.W.2d 158

Charles C. CUDD and Daral Morrow Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. James R. CROWNHART, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided January 8, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas R. Schumacher and Doar, Drill & Skow, S.C., of Baldwin.

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of Keith Rodli and Rodli, Beskar & Boles, S.C., of River Falls.

Before Cane, P.J., Dean and Brown, JJ.


CANE, P.J.

James Crownhart appeals a judgment holding him liable for compensatory and punitive damages in an action for intentionally interfering with a prospective contract between the respondents, Daral Morrow and Charles Cudd and, a third party, LeRoy Toth. The primary issues are whether Wisconsin recognizes a cause of action for the intentional interference with a prospective contractual relation and, if so, whether there is sufficient credible evidence to support...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases