PROKASY v. PEARLE VISION CENTER

No. 49804.

27 Ohio App. 3d 44 (1985)

PROKASY, APPELLANT, v. PEARLE VISION CENTER, APPELLEE.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County.

Decided December 16, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas & Boles and Stephen G. Thomas, for appellant.

Arter & Hadden, Irene Keyse-Walker, Robert C. Tucker and Susan E. Raabe, for appellee.


MARKUS, P.J.

The plaintiff customer appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her claim against the defendant optical supplier as barred by limitations. The optical supplier contends that R.C. 2305.10 governs the customer's claim as "an action for bodily injury." However, to the extent that the claim seeks damages "for the breach of any contract for sale," R.C. 1302.98 governs.

The two years allowed by R.C...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases