Under section 220 of the Labor Law, plaintiff is entitled to receive the prevailing hourly wage rate, i.e., that rate paid to the majority of local private industry laborers performing similar work. As previously found by Special Term and affirmed by this court (91 A.D.2d 878), the city may not offset plaintiff's reimbursement by the amount of "supplemental" benefits already paid to him, despite the evidence that prevailing union
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MESCIA v. CITY OF NEW YORK
107 A.D.2d 586 (1985)
Vincent A. Mescia, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 8, 1985
January 8, 1985
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
