PRATER v. KENT

No. 11570-7-I.

40 Wn. App. 639 (1985)

699 P.2d 1248

SHARON L. PRATER, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF KENT, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

April 1, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary E. Hall, for appellant.

P. Stephen DiJulio, City Attorney, for respondents.


RINGOLD, J.

Sharon Prater appeals the judgment dismissing her action against the City of Kent. She contends that the trial court erred in dismissing her claim of retaliatory discharge and in finding that the City did not discriminate against her on the basis of sex or handicap. She also assigns error to the finding that the City had a legitimate reason for terminating her employment, asserting that the court failed to consider whether the articulated reason was pretextual...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases