PINEMAN v. OECHSLIN

(12529)

195 Conn. 405 (1985)

KAREN K. PINEMAN ET AL. v. WILLIAM G. OECHSLIN ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released March 12, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul W. Orth, with whom was Austin Carey, Jr., for the appellants-appellees (plaintiffs).

Peter T. Zarella, with whom was Richard R. Brown, for the appellees-appellants (defendants).

HEALEY, PARSKEY, SHEA, DANNEHY and BIELUCH, JS.


PARSKEY, J.

The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether state employees have contractual interests in the State Employees Retirement Act (act), General Statutes §§ 5-152 through 5-192x. Because we agree with the trial court that the act creates no contractual rights we find no error.

The plaintiffs brought a class action in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut against the named defendant, chairman of the state...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases