SALITERMAN v. FINNEY

No. C1-84-1621.

361 N.W.2d 175 (1985)

Dr. L.M. SALITERMAN and Associates, P.A., etc., Appellants, v. Dr. Mark FINNEY, D.D.S., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 22, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maher J. Weinstein, Moss & Barnett, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Paul L. Ratelle, Barna, Guzy, Merrill, Hynes & Giancola, Ltd., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by SEDGWICK, P.J., and FOLEY and CRIPPEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant questions a holding that a noncompete covenant in an employment agreement may not be assigned ancillary to the sale of a business, and a finding that respondent "at no time assented to any assignment [of this] agreement," despite contractual language to the contrary. We reverse and remand.

Respondent challenges the propriety of the trial court's order enjoining him from using confidential information obtained from...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases