SAV. BANK v. TAX COMMN.


107 A.D.2d 205 (1985)

Savings Bank of Utica, Appellant, v. New York State Tax Commission, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

March 1, 1985


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Evans, Severn, Bankert & Peet (Thomas F. O'Donnell of counsel), for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Michael S. Buskus and William J. Kogan of counsel), for respondent.

HANCOCK, JR., J. P., CALLAHAN, DENMAN and SCHNEPP, JJ., concur.


DOERR, J.

The central issue on this appeal is whether the New York franchise tax scheme, which provides different tax treatment for commercial and savings banks (Tax Law § 1450 et seq.), violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution. A similar challenge was rejected over a decade ago (Woodside Sav. & Loan Assn. v Gallman, 73 Misc.2d 357

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases