This case is before us on appeal from the district court's dismissal of Eichman's lawsuit on the ground that Eichman's claims were barred by the res judicata effect of an earlier state suit. Because California preclusion law includes the requirement of prior jurisdictional competency, under Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
EICHMAN v. FOTOMAT CORP.
759 F.2d 1434 (1985)
Adrian C. EICHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOTOMAT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued October 7, 1982.
Submitted March 25, 1985.
Decided May 10, 1985.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Wright & L'Estrange, John H. L'Estrange, Jr., William R. Nevitt, Jr., Sullivan & Jones, David R. Markham, Samuel J. Goldberg, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellee.
Before KENNEDY, TANG and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.