AARO, INC. v. DAEWOO INTERN. (AMERICA) CORP.

No. 84-8584. Non-Argument Calendar.

755 F.2d 1398 (1985)

AARO, INC., and Allen Rosenblum, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DAEWOO INTERNATIONAL (AMERICA) CORP., a New York Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 4, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry L. Katz, Richard H. Siegel, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Tom Pye, W. Tray Carter, Doraville, Ga., for defendant-appellee.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.


KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

The primary issue presented in this motion is whether a plaintiff who has consented to a remittitur order may appeal parts of the judgment that are unrelated to the order. We answer this question in the affirmative, and therefore deny the defendant's motion to dismiss the appeal.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1977, Aaro, Inc. ("Aaro"), agreed to sell on commission footwear manufactured by Daewoo International (America...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases