Bu ROE v. I.N.S.

No. 84-7461.

771 F.2d 1328 (1985)

Hurn Bu ROE, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 20, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Manulkin, William B. Bennett, Manulkin & Glaser, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Ian Fan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before WALLACE, TANG and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

Hurn Bu Roe invokes our jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a) to review a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA found him deportable for failure to fulfill his marital agreement and as an alien who was excludable at the time of entry for lack of a valid labor certification and a valid visa. The BIA also denied Roe's application for suspension of deportation. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases