STATE v. BUCKNER

No. 84-2713.

472 So.2d 1228 (1985)

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Mark BUCKNER, Fred Senczyszyn and Lenora Senczyszyn, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Rehearing Denied July 25, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Candance M. Sunderland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Russell K. Peavyhouse of Peavyhouse, Grant, Clark, Charlton, Opp & Martino, Tampa, for appellee Buckner.

Allen M. Blake of Allen M. Blake, P.A., Tampa, for appellees Senczyszyn.


FRANK, Judge.

We reverse the order of the trial court. There is no constitutional infirmity in section 232.02, Florida Statutes. That statute plainly sets out the means by which regular school attendance is to be achieved.

The trial court found section 232.02 so impermissibly vague that the appellees, who were accused of failing to insure their children's regular attendance at school, could not know whether their conduct subjected them to criminal liability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases