1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 767 F.2d
  5. 767 F.2d 882 (1985)
 

MAC CORP. OF AMERICA v. WILLIAMS PATENT CRUSHER & PULVERIZER CO.

Appeal No. 85-883.

767 F.2d 882 (1985)

MAC CORPORATION OF AMERICA and WDS, Inc. (Successors in Interest to Saturn Manufacturing, Inc.), Appellants, v. WILLIAMS PATENT CRUSHER & PULVERIZER CO. and Robert M. Williams, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 8, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Leigh, Klarquist, Sparkman, Campbell, Leigh & Whinston, of Portland, Or., argued for appellants. With him on the brief were Alexander C. Johnson, Jr. and Mark S. Matkin.

Gerald D. Morris and Richard L. Prebil, Shepherd, Sandberg & Phoenix, of St. Louis, Mo., of counsel.

Jeffrey W. Tayon, Butler & Binion, of Houston, Tex., argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Ned L. Conley.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, KASHIWA and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

MAC Corporation of America (MAC) appeals from denial of a motion for a show cause order and contempt judgment. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.

Background

(a) Underlying Infringement Action

MAC is successor in interest to Saturn Manufacturing, Inc. (Saturn), owner of United States Patent 4,034,918 (the '918 patent). The '918 patent is directed to an industrial shear-type...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases