1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 779 F.2d
  5. 779 F.2d 675 (1985)
 

LAW MATHEMATICS AND TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. U.S.

Appeal No. 85-2150.

779 F.2d 675 (1985)

LAW MATHEMATICS AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 12, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George C. Sponsler, III, Bethesda, Md., argued for appellant.

John S. Groat, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With him on brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Thomas W. Petersen, Asst. Director, Washington, D.C.; Raymond M. Katona, Office of Naval Research, Arlington, Va., of counsel.

Before RICH, SMITH and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges.

RICH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the October 29, 1984, final decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (board), No. 29714, 85-1 BCA (CCH) ¶ 17,765 (ASBCA 1984), denying appellant Law Mathematics and Technology, Inc. (LMT) additional funding for a contract involving research on air-launched and anti-ship missile defense for the Navy. We affirm.

Background

LMT is a research and development consulting firm. The president...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases