NEWKIRK v. STATE

Nos. 82-4649-J-1; CA A31136.

699 P.2d 677 (1985)

73 Or.App. 568

John Dalton NEWKIRK, Appellant, v. STATE of Oregon, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 15, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Newkirk, Medford, filed the brief pro se for appellant.

Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., and Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

In this post-conviction relief case, petitioner appeals the trial court's dismissal of his petition on the ground that his theory for relief — inadequate assistance of counsel — had been assigned as error and decided adversely to him on his direct appeal. See State v. Newkirk, 57 Or.App. 428, 646 P.2d 1380, rev den. 293 Or. 394, 650 P.2d 927 (1984) (affirmed without opinion). The trial court erred in so concluding; this court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases