MIDLAND INS. CO. v. ADAM

No. 83-3900.

781 F.2d 526 (1985)

MIDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Charles ADAM, Claimant-Respondent, Continental Insurance Company; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor; Benefits Review Board, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

November 6, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marlin F. Scholl, argued, Scholl, Robinson & Stieg, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.

Benefits Review Bd., U.S. Dept. of Labor, Marianne Demetral Smith, argued, Office of Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., James A. Kandrevas, Southgate, Mich., Donald G. Ducey, Conklin, Benham, McLeod, Ducey & Ottaway, P.C., Detroit, Mich., Thomas P. Chuhran, Martin Critchell, argued, for respondents.

Charles Adams, pro se.

Before KRUPANSKY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.


PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from a claim for benefits under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. Petitioner Midland Insurance Company ("Midland") seeks a review and reversal of an order entered by the Benefits Review Board ("Board") determining that Midland, rather than respondent Continental Insurance Company ("Continental"), is the responsible insurance carrier...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases