MATTER OF HOLLENDONNER


102 N.J. 21 (1985)

504 A.2d 1174

IN THE MATTER OF ANTON J. HOLLENDONNER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 17, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Johnson, Jr., Director, argued the cause for Office of Attorney Ethics.

Robert A. Farkas, argued the cause for respondent (Marinari & Farkas, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

The District VII Ethics Committee (local Committee), acting on a complaint brought by the Office of Attorney Ethics, conducted a hearing and thereafter filed a presentment against Respondent, Anton J. Hollendonner, a member of the bar since 1955. The presentment charged Hollendonner with two instances of misappropriation of client funds, contrary to DR 9-102(A), (B), and (C), and DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4), and ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases