1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 779 F.2d
  5. 779 F.2d 264 (1985)
 

AMUSEMENT EQUIPMENT, INC. v. MORDELT

No. 84-3571.

779 F.2d 264 (1985)

AMUSEMENT EQUIPMENT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl Heinz MORDELT, Heinz Mordelt GMBH and Co. K.G. "Heimo", Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 31, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L.A. Bond, pro se.

Carl D. Rosenblum, Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, New Orleans, La., for Amusement Equipment, Inc.

Arthur L. Ballin, Frank C. Dudenhefer, Jr., New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.

Before GOLDBERG, REAVLEY and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge.

It all started out innocently enough with a contract to deliver a mechanical display elephant and four remote control cars. The German engineering of appellee Heimo Heinz Mordelt GMBH & Co. K.G. ("Heimo") would boost the efforts of Florida's Amusement Equipment, Inc. ("Amusement") to amuse and entertain for profit. But where Hannibal's elephants managed to cross the snowy Alps with relative ease, this elephant and its vehicular entourage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases