OPINION
DUNN, Justice.
The appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. The jury assessed punishment at 40 years.
In his only ground of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred by permitting the enhancement allegation of the indictment to be read and proof offered thereon without first holding a hearing to determine that the prior conviction was valid and the evidence offered was admissible, citing Holcombe v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.