1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 314 S.E.2d
  5. 314 S.E.2d 594 (1984)
 

STATE v. POINDEXTER

No. 8315SC946.

314 S.E.2d 594 (1984)

STATE of North Carolina v. Leroy Felton POINDEXTER.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 1, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Guy A. Hamlin, Raleigh, for the State.

Allen, Walker & Cecil by Loretta A. Cecil, Burlington, for defendant-appellant.

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Defendant's first and main contention is that the pretrial photographic identification procedure employed by the State was unnecessarily suggestive and created a substantial likelihood that the identification at trial was tainted, thus requiring its exclusion. This contention is without merit. Following defendant's motion to suppress, Judge Lewis conducted an extensive voir dire hearing thereon. Testimony

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases